Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 504
Filtrar
1.
Fertil Steril ; 117(1): 15-21, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34753600

RESUMO

When a diverse group of individuals is working together in the contemporary fertility clinic to provide time-sensitive and complex care for patients, a high degree of coordination and collaboration must take place. When performed dynamically, this process is referred to as teaming. Although the positive impact of teamwork in health care settings has been well established in the literature, the concept of teaming has limited foundation in the clinic. This review will provide an overview of how teaming can be used to improve patient care in today's fertility clinics. Approaches to integrating teaming into the clinic that will be discussed include framing, the creation of a psychologically safe environment for staff input, and facilitating collaborative constructs to support teaming. Best practices to implement teaming and how to address challenges to teaming in today's clinical environment will also be addressed.


Assuntos
Clínicas de Fertilização , Cultura Organizacional , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Calibragem/normas , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Clínicas de Fertilização/organização & administração , Clínicas de Fertilização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/tendências , Gravidez
2.
JAMA Intern Med ; 182(1): 42-49, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34807241

RESUMO

Importance: Systemic corticosteroids are commonly used in treating severe COVID-19. However, the role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate disease is less clear. Objective: To determine the efficacy of the inhaled steroid ciclesonide in reducing the time to alleviation of all COVID-19-related symptoms among nonhospitalized participants with symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 10 centers throughout the US and assessed the safety and efficacy of a ciclesonide metered-dose inhaler (MDI) for treating nonhospitalized participants with symptomatic COVID-19 infection who were screened from June 11, 2020, to November 3, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive ciclesonide MDI, 160 µg per actuation, for a total of 2 actuations twice a day (total daily dose, 640 µg) or placebo for 30 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was time to alleviation of all COVID-19-related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, chills, feeling feverish, repeated shaking with chills, muscle pain, headache, sore throat, and new loss of taste or smell) by day 30. Secondary end points included subsequent emergency department visits or hospital admissions for reasons attributable to COVID-19. Results: A total of 413 participants were screened and 400 (96.9%) were enrolled and randomized (197 [49.3%] in the ciclesonide arm and 203 [50.7%] in the placebo arm; mean [SD] age, 43.3 [16.9] years; 221 [55.3%] female; 2 [0.5%] Asian, 47 [11.8%] Black or African American, 3 [0.8%] Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 345 [86.3%] White, and 1 multiracial individuals [0.3%]; 172 Hispanic or Latino individuals [43.0%]). The median time to alleviation of all COVID-19-related symptoms was 19.0 days (95% CI, 14.0-21.0) in the ciclesonide arm and 19.0 days (95% CI, 16.0-23.0) in the placebo arm. There was no difference in resolution of all symptoms by day 30 (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.84-1.97). Participants who were treated with ciclesonide had fewer subsequent emergency department visits or hospital admissions for reasons related to COVID-19 (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.85). No participants died during the study. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrated that ciclesonide did not achieve the primary efficacy end point of reduced time to alleviation of all COVID-19-related symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04377711.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Pregnenodionas/normas , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/normas , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Inaladores Dosimetrados , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pregnenodionas/uso terapêutico
3.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 20560, 2021 10 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34663846

RESUMO

The outcomes of patients with incident kidney failure who start hemodialysis are influenced by several factors. Whether hemodialysis facility characteristics are associated with patient outcomes is unclear. We included adults diagnosed as having kidney failure requiring hemodialysis during January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2013 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to perform this retrospective cohort study. The exposures included different sizes and levels of hemodialysis facilities. The outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, infection-related death, hospitalization, and kidney transplantation. During 2001-2013, we identified 74,406 patients and divided them in to three groups according to the facilities where they receive hemodialysis: medical center (n = 8263), non-center hospital (n = 40,008), and clinic (n = 26,135). The multivariable Cox model demonstrated that a larger facility size was associated with a low mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.991, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.984-0.998; every 20 beds per facility). Compared with medical centers, patients in non-center hospitals and clinics had higher mortality risks (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17 and HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.15, respectively). Patients in medical centers and non-center hospitals had higher risk of hospitalization (subdistribution HR [SHR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.10-1.12 and SHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.21-1.23, respectively). Patients in medical centers had the highest rate of kidney transplantation among the three groups. In patients with incident kidney failure, a larger hemodialysis facility size was associated with lower mortality. Overall, medical center patients had a lower mortality rate and higher transplantation rate, whereas clinic patients had a lower hospitalization risk.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 34(10): 539-541, 2021 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546205

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Leg ulcers affect 15% of people with sickle cell disease. However, wound centers typically treat few people with this condition, which makes it difficult to concentrate clinical expertise or support the scientific study of this orphan disease. This article describes an initiative to increase engagement in care through a partnership between wound healing and hematology leadership that led to colocating wound services within a sickle cell clinic. METHODS: Via a retrospective chart review, the authors collected records of all adult patients with sickle cell disease who received wound care in the last decade, including 7 years of wound center data and 3 years of data from the colocated services. Patient and visit characteristics were analyzed using descriptive analytics. RESULTS: The general wound center had previously treated 35 patients with sickle cell ulcers over 7 years. In contrast, colocated services engaged 56 patients within 3 years, including 20 who transferred care and 36 new patients. The majority of patients at the colocated site were women, unlike at the wound center (58% vs 47%, P = .07). Results indicated that 36% of patients healed initial wounds, and 45% had new wound occurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Colocation successfully increases the number of patients with sickle cell ulcers who will engage in wound care at a single site, laying the foundation for clinical studies to improve the evidence base for this difficult-to-treat condition.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Hematologia/métodos , Úlcera/etiologia , Cicatrização , Adulto , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Feminino , Hematologia/instrumentação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Úlcera/terapia
5.
Dermatol Clin ; 39(4): 587-597, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34556248

RESUMO

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dermatology practice cannot be overstated. At its peak, the pandemic resulted in the temporary closure of ambulatory sites as resources were reallocated towards pandemic response efforts. Many outpatient clinics have since reopened and are beginning to experience a semblance of pre-pandemic routine, albeit with restrictions in place. We provide an overview of how COVID-19 has affected dermatology practice globally beginning with the rise of teledermatology. A summary of expert recommendations that shape the "new normal" in various domains of dermatology practice, namely, dermatology consultation, procedural dermatology, and phototherapy, is also provided.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Dermatologia/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Dermatopatias/terapia , Telemedicina/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Dermatologia/tendências , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Visita a Consultório Médico/tendências , Dermatopatias/epidemiologia
7.
Am J Public Health ; 111(8): 1504-1512, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185578

RESUMO

Objectives. To examine changes in abortions in Louisiana before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset and assess whether variations in abortion service availability during this time might explain observed changes. Methods. We collected monthly service data from abortion clinics in Louisiana and neighboring states among Louisiana residents (January 2018‒May 2020) and assessed changes in abortions following pandemic onset. We conducted mystery client calls to 30 abortion clinics in Louisiana and neighboring states (April‒July 2020) and examined the percentage of open and scheduling clinics and median waits. Results. The number of abortions per month among Louisiana residents in Louisiana clinics decreased 31% (incidence rate ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59, 0.79) from before to after pandemic onset, while the odds of having a second-trimester abortion increased (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.10, 3.33). The decrease was not offset by an increase in out-of-state abortions. In Louisiana, only 1 or 2 (of 3) clinics were open (with a median wait > 2 weeks) through early May. Conclusions. The COVID-19 pandemic onset was associated with a significant decrease in the number of abortions and increase in the proportion of abortions provided in the second trimester among Louisiana residents. These changes followed service disruptions.


Assuntos
Aborto Legal/tendências , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Louisiana , Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Estados Unidos
8.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 29(6): 941-943, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33904257

RESUMO

Nearly one-fifth of the pediatric population in the United States has obesity. Comprehensive behavioral interventions, with at least 26 contact hours, are the recommended treatment for pediatric obesity; however, there are various barriers to implementing treatment. This Perspective applies the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework to address barriers to implementing multidisciplinary pediatric weight management clinics and identify potential solutions and areas for additional research. Lack of insurance coverage and reimbursement, high operating costs, and limited access to stage 4 care clinics with sufficient capacity were among the main barriers identified. Clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates are encouraged to facilitate conversations with insurance companies and hospital and clinic administrators, increase telehealth adoption, request training to improve competency and self-efficacy discussing and implementing obesity care, and advocate for more stage 4 clinics.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/provisão & distribuição , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Obesidade Pediátrica/terapia , Adolescente , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/métodos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/normas , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Ciência da Implementação , Obesidade Pediátrica/epidemiologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Telemedicina , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(15): 1383-1391, 2021 08 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33780398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As part of a market-driven response to the increasing costs of hospital-based surgical care, an increasing volume of orthopaedic procedures are being performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The purpose of the present study was to identify recent trends in orthopaedic ASC procedure volume, utilization, and reimbursements in the Medicare system between 2012 and 2017. METHODS: This cross-sectional, national study tracked annual Medicare claims and payments and aggregated data at the county level. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate trends in procedure volume, utilization rates, and reimbursement rates, and to identify demographic predictors of ASC utilization. RESULTS: A total of 1,914,905 orthopaedic procedures were performed at ASCs in the Medicare population between 2012 and 2017, with an 8.8% increase in annual procedure volume and a 10.5% increase in average reimbursements per case. ASC orthopaedic procedure utilization, including utilization across all subspecialties, is strongly associated with metropolitan areas compared with rural areas. In addition, orthopaedic procedure utilization, including for sports and hand procedures, was found to be significantly higher in wealthier counties (measured by average household income) and in counties located in the South. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated increasing orthopaedic ASC procedure volume in recent years, driven by increases in hand procedure volume. Medicare reimbursements per case have steadily risen and outpaced the rate of inflation over the study period. However, as orthopaedic practice overhead continues to increase, other Medicare expenditures such as hospital payments and operational and implant costs also must be evaluated. These findings may provide a source of information that can be used by orthopaedic surgeons, policy makers, investors, and other stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding the costs and benefits of the use of ASCs for orthopaedic procedures.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/tendências , Medicare Part B/tendências , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , Estudos Transversais , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare Part B/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
12.
Toxins (Basel) ; 13(2)2021 01 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33573065

RESUMO

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) injections have to be administered repeatedly to achieve a rather stable, high level of improvement. This study aimed to take a look at changes in the daily routine of a BoNT/A outpatient clinic due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic lockdown, analyze the impact of SARS-CoV-2-induced re-injection delay on outcomes in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) (n = 36) and four other disease entities (n = 58), and study the influence of covariables, including previous injections and doses. For the present observational study, the first 100 patients who were scheduled to have an appointment between April 20 and May 18 during the partial lockdown and also had been treated regularly before the lockdown were recruited. Clinical and demographical characteristics and treatment-related data from the previous visits were extracted from charts. Time delay, symptom severity assessment, and TSUI score (if applicable) were gathered at the first coronavirus pandemic lockdown emergency visit for each patient. Of the 94 patients who could come to the clinic, 48 reported a delay and 44 reported worsening during the delay. Delays ranged from 1 to 63 days, the mean delay was 23 days, and the mean worsening was 26% compared to the previous visit. A significant correlation was found between the duration of the delay and the patient's rating of worsening (PwP). In CD patients, the physician´s rating of CD worsening by the TSUI score (ATUSI-PTSUI) was significantly correlated with general worsening (DwP) and the TSUI at the last visit (PTSUI). A small delay of a few weeks led to a similar worsening of symptoms in CD and all other disease entities and to relapse on a higher level of severity. This relapse can only be compensated by continuous treatment up to at least 1 year until patients reach the same level of treatment efficacy as that before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Pandemias , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administração & dosagem , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Alemanha , Humanos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Tempo para o Tratamento
13.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 104, 2021 02 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that heart failure (HF) patients who receive direct pharmacist input as part of multidisciplinary care have better clinical outcomes. This study evaluated/compared the difference in prescribing practices of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for chronic HF patients between two multidisciplinary clinics-with and without the direct involvement of a pharmacist. METHODS: A retrospective audit of chronic HF patients, presenting to two multidisciplinary outpatient clinics between March 2005 and January 2017, was performed; a Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Consulting Service (MACS) with an integrated pharmacist model of care and a General Cardiology Heart Failure Service (GCHFS) clinic, without the active involvement of a pharmacist. RESULTS: MACS clinic patients were significantly older (80 vs. 73 years, p < .001), more likely to be female (p < .001), and had significantly higher systolic (123 vs. 112 mmHg, p < .001) and diastolic (67 vs. 60 mmHg, p < .05) blood pressures compared to the GCHF clinic patients. Moreover, the MACS clinic patients showed more polypharmacy and higher prevalence of multiple comorbidities. Both clinics had similar prescribing rates of GDMT and achieved maximal tolerated doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in HFrEF. However, HFpEF patients in the MACS clinic were significantly more likely to be prescribed ACEIs/ARBs (70.5% vs. 56.2%, p = 0.0314) than the GCHFS patients. Patients with both HFrEF and HFpEF (MACS clinic) were significantly less likely to be prescribed ß-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Use of digoxin in chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) in MACS clinic was significantly higher in HFrEF patients (82.5% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.004), but the number of people anticoagulated in presence of AF (27.1% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.002) and prescribed diuretics (84.0% vs. 94.5%, p = 0.022) were significantly lower in HFpEF patients attending the MACS clinic. Age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), anemia, chronic renal failure, and other comorbidities were the main significant predictors of utilization of GDMT in a multivariate binary logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Lower prescription rates of some medications in the pharmacist-involved multidisciplinary team were found. Careful consideration of demographic and clinical characteristics, contraindications for use of medications, polypharmacy, and underlying comorbidities is necessary to achieve best practice.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Austrália do Sul/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo
14.
Epilepsy Behav ; 116: 107740, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33545652

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility, patient satisfaction, and financial advantages of telemedicine for epilepsy ambulatory care during the current COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The demographic and clinical characteristics of all consecutive patients evaluated via telemedicine at a level 4 epilepsy center between March 20 and April 20, 2020 were obtained retrospectively from electronic medical records. A telephone survey to assess patient satisfaction and preferences was conducted within one month following the initial visit. RESULTS: Among 223 telehealth patients, 85.7% used both synchronous audio and video technology. During the visits, 39% of patients had their anticonvulsants adjusted while 18.8% and 11.2% were referred to laboratory/diagnostic testing and specialty consults, respectively. In a post-visit survey, the highest degree of satisfaction with care was expressed by 76.9% of patients. The degree of satisfaction tended to increase the further a patient lived from the clinic (p = 0.05). Beyond the pandemic, 89% of patients reported a preference for continuing telemedicine if their epilepsy symptoms remained stable, while only 44.4% chose telemedicine should their symptoms worsen. Inclement weather and lack of transportation were factors favoring continued use of telemedicine. An estimated cost saving to patient attributed to telemedicine was $30.20 ±â€¯3.8 per visit. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that epilepsy care via telemedicine provided high satisfaction and economic benefit, without compromising patients' quality of care, thereby supporting the use of virtual care during current and future epidemiological fallouts. Beyond the current pandemic, patients with stable seizure symptoms may prefer to use telemedicine for their epilepsy care.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/terapia , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Satisfação do Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Telemedicina/tendências
15.
Pediatrics ; 147(2)2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33097659

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: US immigration policy changes may affect health care use among Latinx children. We hypothesized that January 2017 restrictive immigration executive actions would lead to decreased health care use among Latinx children. METHODS: We used controlled interrupted time series to estimate the effect of executive actions on outpatient cancellation or no-show rates from October 2016 to March 2017 ("immigration action period") among Latinx children in 4 health care systems in North Carolina. We included control groups of (1) non-Latinx children and (2) Latinx children from the same period in the previous year ("control period") to account for natural trends such as seasonality. RESULTS: In the immigration action period, 114 627 children contributed 314 092 appointments. In the control period, 107 657 children contributed 295 993 appointments. Relative to the control period, there was an immediate 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40%-10.9%) decrease in cancellation rates among all Latinx children, but no sustained change in trend of cancellations and no change in no-show rates after executive immigration actions. Among uninsured Latinx children, there was an immediate 12.7% (95% CI: 2.3%-23.1%) decrease in cancellations; however, cancellations then increased by 2.4% (95% CI: 0.89%-3.9%) per week after immigration actions, an absolute increase of 15.5 cancellations per 100 appointments made. CONCLUSIONS: There was a sustained increase in cancellations among uninsured Latinx children after immigration actions, suggesting decreased health care use among uninsured Latinx children. Continued monitoring of effects of immigration policy on child health is needed, along with measures to ensure that all children receive necessary health care.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Emigração e Imigração/tendências , Política de Saúde/tendências , Hispânico ou Latino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/legislação & jurisprudência , Agendamento de Consultas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/legislação & jurisprudência , Emigração e Imigração/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Hispânico ou Latino/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida/legislação & jurisprudência , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida/tendências , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia
16.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(2): 153-163, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33094549

RESUMO

AIM: Haemodialysis treatment prescription varies widely internationally. This study explored patient- and centre-level characteristics associated with weekly haemodialysis hours. METHODS: Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry data were analysed. Characteristics associated with weekly duration were evaluated using mixed-effects linear regression models with patient- and centre-level covariates as fixed effects, and dialysis centre and state as random effects using the 2017 prevalent in-centre haemodialysis (ICHD) and home haemodialysis (HHD) cohorts. Evaluation of patterns of weekly duration over time analysed the 2000 to 2017 incident ICHD and HHD cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 12 494 ICHD and 1493 HHD prevalent patients in 2017 were included. Median weekly treatment duration was 13.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 12-15) hours for ICHD and 16 (IQR 15-20) hours for HHD. Male sex, younger age, higher body mass index, arteriovenous fistula/graft use, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethnicity and longer dialysis vintage were associated with longer weekly duration for both ICHD and HHD. No centre characteristics were associated with duration. Variability in duration across centres was very limited in ICHD compared with HHD, with variation in HHD being associated with state. Duration did not vary significantly over time for ICHD, whereas longer weekly HHD treatments were reported between 2006 and 2012 compared with before and after this period. CONCLUSION: This study in the Australian and New Zealand haemodialysis population showed that weekly duration was primarily associated with patient characteristics. No centre effect was demonstrated. Practice patterns seemed to differ across states/countries, with more variability in HHD than ICHD.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Nefrologistas/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Diálise Renal/tendências , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Fatores de Tempo
17.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 28(3): 622-627, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33067617

RESUMO

Prior research on health information exchange (HIE) typically measured provider usage through surveys or they summarized the availability of HIE services in a healthcare organization. Few studies utilized user log files. Using HIE access log files, we measured HIE use in real-world clinical settings over a 7-year period (2011-2017). Use of HIE increased in inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) settings. Further, while extant literature has generally viewed the ED as the most relevant setting for HIE, the greatest change in HIE use was observed in the inpatient setting, followed by the ED setting and then the outpatient setting. Our findings suggest that in addition to federal incentives, the implementation of features that address barriers to access (eg, Single Sign On), as well as value-added services (eg, interoperability with external data sources), may be related to the growth in user-initiated HIE.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Troca de Informação em Saúde/tendências , Hospitais/tendências , Interoperabilidade da Informação em Saúde , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar , Humanos , Estados Unidos
19.
J Autism Dev Disord ; 51(5): 1540-1549, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32770344

RESUMO

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is commonly comorbid with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Here, in a sample of 86 children and adolescents (MAGE = 12.62 years; 68.6% male), 28 of whom were diagnosed with ASD, 34 with SAD, and 24 with comorbid ASD and SAD, we compared parent-reported scores from the Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition (SRS-2; Constantino and Gruber in Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; Constantino and Gruber 2012) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the measure in cases of differential diagnosis between SAD and ASD. Results suggest that neither the subscales, nor the SRS-2 total score, consistently differed between ASD and SAD. Sensitivity and specificity analyses suggested that the SRS-2 total poorly discriminated ASD from SAD. When screening socially anxious youth for possible ASD, caution should be taken.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Fobia Social/diagnóstico , Fobia Social/psicologia , Adolescente , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Fobia Social/epidemiologia
20.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243279, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33270778

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) receive federal funding to serve medically underserved areas and provide a range of services including comprehensive primary care, enabling services, and behavioral health care. Greater funding for FQHCs could increase the local availability of clinic-based care and help reduce more costly resource use, such as emergency department visits (ED). OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of funding increases for FQHCs after the ACA on the use of FQHCs and EDs. METHODS: Retrospective study using the Massachusetts All Payer Claims Database (APCD) 2010-2013 that included APCD enrollees in 559 Massachusetts ZIP codes (N = 6,173,563 in 2010). We calculated shift-share predictions of changes in FQHC funding at the ZIP code-level for FQHCs that received Community Health Center funds in any year, 2010-13 (N = 31). Outcomes were the number of ZIP code enrollees with visits to FQHCs and EDs, overall and for emergent and non-emergent diagnoses. RESULTS: In 2010, 4% of study subjects visited a FQHC, and they were more likely to be younger, have Medicaid, and live in low-income areas. We found that a standard deviation increase in prior year FQHC funding (+31 percentage point (pp)) at the ZIP code level was associated with a 2.3pp (95% CI 0.7pp to 3.8pp) increase in enrollees with FQHC visits and a 1.3pp (95% CI -2.3pp to -0.3pp) decrease in enrollees with non-emergent ED visits, but no significant change in emergent ED visits (0.3pp, 95% CI -0.8pp to 1.4pp). CONCLUSIONS: We found that areas exposed to greater FQHC funding increases had more growth in the number of enrollees seen by FQHCs and greater reductions in ED visits for non-emergent conditions. Investment in FQHCs could be a promising approach to increase access to care for underserved populations and reduce costly ED visits, especially for primary care treatable or non-emergent conditions.


Assuntos
Instalações de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Centros Comunitários de Saúde/economia , Centros Comunitários de Saúde/tendências , Instalações de Saúde/tendências , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Massachusetts , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Populações Vulneráveis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...